STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY
S. 3110 - American Energy and Conservation Act of 2016
(Sen. Cassidy, R-LA, and five cosponsors)
The
Administration strongly opposes S. 3110, the American Energy and
Conservation Act. The bill would, among other things, change existing
revenue sharing laws to increase the amount that certain States and
counties would receive from energy production on Federal lands and
waters, thereby reducing the fair return on the development of these
minerals to taxpayers across the country for their shared resources. S.
3110 would have significant and long-term costs to the Federal
Treasury.
The
Department of the Interior, which oversees the development of about 23
percent of domestic energy supplies collects, on average, over $10
billion annually from the development of Federal minerals, including
fossil and renewable energy resources. Various statutes govern how
these revenues are allocated depending on the resource type and
location. About half of the Federal revenue from onshore energy
development is shared with States or counties, with the remainder
deposited in the Treasury, where it offsets annual appropriations or
otherwise contributes to deficit reduction. The majority of revenue
generated from offshore energy leases on the Federal Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS) goes to the Treasury, while a portion goes to fund important
Federal conservation programs through contributions to the Land and
Water Conservation Fund and the Historic Preservation Fund. Through the
Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (GOMESA), the amount of OCS
revenue allocated to revenue sharing payments to nearby States and
counties is already set to increase dramatically in fiscal year 2018.
The
Administration takes seriously its responsibility to the public for the
stewardship of the Nation's energy resources and public assets that
generate royalty revenue from Federal leases. It remains committed to
ensuring that American taxpayers receive a fair return from the sale of
public resources owned by all Americans. That is why the President's
2017 Budget proposes to redirect future GOMESA revenue sharing payments
to the dual objectives of reducing the deficit and enhancing the
resilience of coastal communities nationwide to the impacts of climate
change. In contrast, the provisions of S. 3110 would ultimately reduce
the fair return on the development of these minerals to taxpayers across
the country for their shared resources, would result in reductions of
billions of dollars in deposits to the Treasury, and would add
significantly to the Federal deficit.
If the President were presented with S. 3110, his senior advisors would recommend he veto the bill.
Source: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget
No comments:
Post a Comment