Photo source: Department of Defense
Author: DOD photo by Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo
Permission: Public Domain
1. We, the leaders of the United States and the European Union, met today at the White House to affirm our close partnership. Drawing upon our shared values and experience, and recognizing our deep interdependence, we are committed to ensuring that our partnership brings greater prosperity and security to our 800 million citizens, and to working together to address global challenges.
2. Since our meeting in Lisbon last November, the global economy has entered a new and difficult phase. We are committed to working together to reinvigorate economic growth, create jobs, and ensure financial stability. We will do so by taking actions that address near-term growth concerns, as well as fiscal and financial vulnerabilities, and that strengthen the foundations of long-lasting and balanced growth. In that regard, the United States welcomes the EU’s actions and determination to take all necessary steps to ensure the euro area’s financial stability and resolve the crisis. The EU looks forward to U.S. action on medium term fiscal consolidation. We agree on the importance of working together with emerging economies to foster policies supporting sustained and balanced global growth. We recall our commitment to implement fully the outcome of the G20 Cannes Summit.
3. We recall our G20 commitment to support the multilateral trading system and resist protectionism. We stand by the Doha Development Agenda mandate and recognize the progress achieved so far, but note that in order to contribute to confidence we must pursue fresh, credible approaches in 2012 to advance the negotiations and pursue new opportunities and challenges. We look forward to the upcoming Ministerial meeting in Geneva, which provides an important opportunity to work on such approaches.
4. We applaud the success of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) on a wide range of issues and welcome the progress achieved in secure trade and supply chain security, electric vehicles and related infrastructure, regulatory practices, small and medium-sized enterprises, and in the Information Communications Technology (ICT) sector. We encourage the TEC’s continued leadership in helping us avoid unnecessary divergence in regulations and standards that adversely affects trade. We urge the TEC, together with our regulators and standard-setters to step up cooperation in key sectors such as nanotechnology and raw materials to develop compatible approaches to emerging technologies. We also instruct the TEC to pursue its work on strategic economic questions, not least in the field of investment, innovation policy, and the protection of intellectual property rights to level the playing field for our companies in third countries, in particular emerging economies.
5. We must intensify our efforts to realize the untapped potential of transatlantic economic cooperation to generate new opportunities for jobs and growth, particularly in emerging sectors. We are committed to making the U.S.-EU trade and investment relationship – already the largest and most integrated in the world – stronger. To that end, we have directed the TEC to establish a joint High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth, co-chaired by the U.S. Trade Representative and the European Commissioner for Trade. We ask the Working Group to identify and assess options for strengthening the U.S.-EU economic relationship, especially those that have the highest potential to support jobs and growth. The Working Group is to report its recommendations and conclusions to Leaders by the end of 2012, with an interim report in June 2012 on the status of this work.
6. We recognize the vital role of the U.S.-EU Energy Council in fostering cooperation on energy security, renewables and other clean energy technologies, energy efficiency, and effective policies for facilitating trade and bringing clean energy technologies to market. We affirm the value of common approaches toward safe and sustainable development of energy resources and the diversification of supplies. We also call for reinforced bilateral and multilateral cooperation with a special focus on critical materials, smart grid technologies, hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, and nuclear fusion.
7. On climate change, we affirm our intent to work closely together to ensure a positive, balanced outcome in Durban, including mitigation, transparency and financing. We stand fully behind the commitments we made last year in Cancun. We affirm that Durban should deliver on operationalizing the Cancun agreements and helping the international community move a step further towards a comprehensive, global framework with the participation of all, including robust and transparent greenhouse gas emissions reduction commitments by all major economies, recalling the 2°C objective agreed upon in Cancun. With this in mind, we will cooperate closely in other relevant fora, notably the Major Economies Forum. We also intend to work together to address other global sources of emissions, including from the aviation and maritime sectors, in the appropriate multilateral forums and consistent with applicable agreements.
8. As the leading donors of development assistance, we reaffirm our commitment to aid effectiveness, recognizing that our joint efforts to advance division of labor, transparency, country ownership, and accountability will enhance the impact of our assistance. We are coordinating our preparations for the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, and will continue to work closely to strengthen partnerships among all development stakeholders, accelerate progress toward the Millennium Development Goals, and address the challenges encountered in fragile states. In 2012, we have committed to make information on foreign assistance programs more accessible and compatible with international standards, and will encourage the OECD DAC to become an international hub for aid transparency. We request the U.S.-EU Development Dialogue to pursue with vigor our joint efforts in areas such as food security, climate change, health and the MDGs. We agreed on the importance of close cooperation on security and development in the Sahel, the Horn of Africa and Afghanistan.
9. The events in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya over the past year offer an historic opportunity for successful democratic reform in the Arab world, inclusive economic and social development, and regional integration. The unfolding democratic process in Tunisia is an encouraging example of the potential for democratic transition. Egypt today has just begun a complex election process as the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces begins to transfer authority over civilian functions to a new government. Still, considerable challenges lie ahead. As the two largest providers of foreign assistance to the region whoshare core principles and values that have helped our own societies and economies to integrate, we pledge to support the democratic transitions underway, as well as broader political and economic reform in the region, including the constitutional reforms in Jordan and Morocco. In Libya, we are working together on short term assistance and needs assessments, and will continue to seek new opportunities for greater cooperation, in coordination with the Transitional National Council and the UN, to meet the needs of the Libyan people.
10. Jointly, and through the Deauville Partnership effort, we intend to promote democracy, peace, and prosperity, and to increase economic growth and integration in the Middle East and North Africa. We are committed to collaborate closely in areas such as support for democratic transitions, strengthening the positive role of civil society, and health and education programming. We also extend our support to making women’s rights a legal and practical reality in the region. We share a strong interest in economic reform and will also jointly promote best practices that support trade, investment, and job creation and deepen intra-regional trade and integration. We are both eager to increase our trade and investment links with the region. We plan to work in partnership with international financial institutions to ensure robust donor coordination and in particular to ratify quickly necessary changes to the agreement establishing the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to allow lending in the region.
11. We call on the Syrian government to end violence immediately, permit the immediate entry of human rights observers and international journalists, and allow for a peaceful and democratic transition. We also welcome the agreement for political transition in Yemen and call on all political actors to help implement it in good faith, and in accordance with UNSCR 2014.
12. We reaffirm the Quartet Statement adopted in New York on 23 September 2011 that provides a framework for direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, and we call on the two parties to engage actively in this effort.
13. On Iran, we share deep concern about activities relating to the possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program, as highlighted in the latest International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General’s report and the November 18 Board of Governors’ resolution. We stress our determination to ensure that Iran complies with its obligations, including abiding by United Nations Security Council resolutions, and to cooperate fully with the IAEA to address the international community’s serious concerns over the nature of its nuclear program. We reaffirm our commitment to work toward a diplomatic solution, implement UN Security Council Resolution 1929 (2010) and other relevant Security Council Resolutions, and consider additional measures given Iran’s continued failure to abide by its international obligations. We also note the recent plot to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to the United States, the sanctions we have imposed thereafter on five individuals including the head of the Qods Force, and our determination to ensure the perpetrators and their accomplices are held to account.
14. With regard to the EU’s Eastern neighbors, we are working together to support democracy, resolve protracted conflicts, foster economic modernisation, and advance their political association and economic integration with the EU, recognizing in this regard the importance of the EU’s Eastern Partnership. We insist that the Government of Belarus immediately release and rehabilitate its political prisoners, and make progress towards respect for the principles of democracy, the rule of law, and human rights; and call on the Government of Ukraine to make good on commitments to uphold democratic values and the rule of law, notably to ensure a fair, transparent and impartial process in trials related to members of the former Government including any appeal in the case of Ms Tymoshenko. The right of appeal should not be compromised by imposing limitations on the defendants’ ability to stand in future elections in Ukraine, including the parliamentary elections scheduled for next year.
15. We pledge to continue our close cooperation in the western Balkans and reaffirm our commitment to preserve stability and to support the reforms needed to move the region forward on its path to Euro-Atlantic integration.
16. The United States and the EU have a strategic interest in enhancing co-operation on political, economic, security, and human rights issues in the Asia-Pacific region to advance peace, stability and prosperity. We intend to increase our dialogue on Asia-Pacific issues and coordinate activities to demonstrate an enduring, high-level commitment to the region and encourage regional integration, including through the region’s multilateral organizations.
17. We note our continued efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with particular attention to plans for the December 5 Bonn Conference on Afghanistan and the international community’s long-term commitment to support sustainable security and economic development in Afghanistan, based on effective and accountable institutions of governance and sustainable assistance levels, after the planned drawdown of international military forces. We support economic development and wider reforms in Pakistan and note Pakistan’s important role and ongoing commitment to combating terrorism and achieving peace and stability in Afghanistan and South Asia.
18. We note the considerable progress made since our last meeting in Lisbon on our commitments on a wide range of transnational security issues that affect our citizens. We welcome the successful completion of negotiations on a new Passenger Name Record agreement, and look forward to its early adoption and ratification. We are determined to finalize negotiations on a comprehensive U.S.-EU data privacy and protection agreement that provides a high level of privacy protection for all individuals and thereby facilitates the exchange of data needed to fight crime and terrorism. We reaffirm our desire to complete secure visa-free travel arrangements between the US and all Member States of the EU as soon as possible and consistent with applicable, domestic legislation. We look forward to a positive outcome for Administration-supported legislation that would refine the criteria for the Visa Waiver Program.
19. We encourage continued efforts to extend our partnership on counter-terrorism cooperation, both bilaterally and multilaterally, including through the UN. We applaud the establishment of the Global Counter-Terrorism Forum, and our cooperation to combat terrorist financing. We strongly support continuation of our joint efforts to empower diaspora communities to counter violent extremism.
20. To strengthen our collaboration on conflict prevention and crisis response, already ongoing in many theaters, the U.S. and EU signed a framework agreement in May 2011 that facilitates U.S. civilian participation in EU crisis management missions. As the trans-Atlantic community faces the challenges of crisis management in an era of fiscal austerity, we encourage further work to strengthen the EU-NATO strategic partnership in crisis management, including on capabilities development, ahead of the 2012 NATO Summit, in the spirit of mutual reinforcement, inclusiveness, and decision-making autonomy.
21. We reaffirm the commitments enshrined in the joint declaration on non-proliferation and disarmament we adopted in 2009 and the joint statement on UNSCR 1540 in 2011. We support the conclusions and recommendations of the May 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference, including the Action Plan and proposed 2012 Middle East conference. We are determined to promote the IAEA’s safeguards, Additional Protocol, and the highest standards of safety and security for peaceful uses of nuclear energy, the Nuclear Security Summit objectives, a successful Biological Weapons Convention Review Conference, and the convening of a Diplomatic Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty in 2012.
22. We share a commitment to a single, global Internet, and will resist unilateral efforts to weaken the security, reliability, or independence of its operations— recognizing that respect for fundamental freedoms online, and joint efforts to strengthen security, are mutually reinforcing. We welcome the progress made by the U.S.-EU Working Group on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime, notably the successful Cyber Atlantic 2011 exercise. We endorse its ambitious goals for 2012, including combating online sexual abuse of children; enhancing the security of domain names and Internet Protocol addresses; promotion of international ratification, including by all EU Member States, of the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime ideally by year’s end; establishing appropriate information exchange mechanisms to jointly engage with the private sector; and confronting the unfair market access barriers that U.S. and European technology companies face abroad.
23. Our meeting today is proof that a strong U.S.-EU partnership is crucial to building a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world. We know that our ability to respond to and overcome the global challenges we face is increased by the degree to which we can act in close coordination and cooperation. We will continue to seek every opportunity to increase our cooperation.
Through the magic of Skype, I met a real hero. And the fate of this man and his mission will inform us about the ultimate outcome of the Arab Spring in Libya and perhaps across the entire region.
Meet David Gerbi, a 50-something psychoanalyst from Rome. But David was born in Libya, a native of Tripoli, who, as a 12-year-old, was exiled, along with 38,000 other Jews who were forced to flee their native Libya in the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day Israel-Arab War.
Over the years, David made numerous attempts to reconnect Jewish exiles with their native land. Initial promises for cooperation during the Gaddafi era led to a perilous arrest. In recent months he hooked up with the rebel forces of the National Transitional Council, the group which has earned critical NATO backing and financial support from key democracies with the promise of a moderate Muslim society that would respect the norms of human rights.
Now, Dr. Gerbi is challenging the NTC to "walk the walk," not just "talk the talk," and decided to spend the High Holy days at the Dar Bishi Synagogue. He spent a day clearing out mounds of garbage: "I cannot pray under the holy banner of Shema Yisrael [Judaism's most important declaration of faith] amidst the filth," he told me. When he returned a second day, locals warned him to flee. But David has not left Tripoli, instead he's decided to place his safety in the balance in order to test the "new" Libya's commitment to religious freedom and tolerance.
To date, authorities have told him "it's too early ... too sensitive a matter." It appears that the NTC hasn't decided whether to rescind the Gaddafi-era classification of the Jewish cemetery from a historic excavation site and restore it and the synagogue to Libyan Jews.
But clearly, David Gerbi's struggle reflects much larger issues.
From Tunis to Cairo to Bahrain, the world is left to wonder whether the heady optimism of the Arab Spring will, in the end, serve the cause of freedom and democracy. The outcome of one Jew's struggle to clean a synagogue in a neighborhood of Libya's capital city will speak volumes.
Here now in his own words: Dr. David Gerbi, one man who has drawn the line in the sand for the rights and dignity of Jews, dead and living.

Meeks: I don’t think anyone can make that determination 14 months in advance of the election. It diverts us from important tasks to spend time navel-gazing. A lot of water can flow under the bridge in a year. Plus, the situation at hand is highly volatile. A month ago most of the media thought Rep. Michelle Bachman was emerging as a first-tier candidate. A couple of weeks later, her star appear to have faded and Texas governor Rick Perry is the media’s favor of the month.
G-Man: Congresswoman Maxine Waters recently appeared on NBC's Meet the Press and stated that the President needs to enact a trillion dollar jobs program in order to get people working and to jump-start the economy. Would this be wise, given the fact that the GOP and Tea Party members vehemently oppose any notion of another stimulus package?
Meeks: While I certainly respect Rep. Waters, the questions I focus on is the following: What is realistic under the existing dynamics of divided government and highly partisan atmospherics? Is it possible to past legislation? Every serious person understands that because of our divided government this can only happen on a bipartisan basis – that somehow pushes the envelope.
I also believe it is important to learn lessons from the first three years of the Obama Administration. Some of my colleagues, along with a number of liberal economists, criticized the President’s stimulus package, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, for being too small. They said it should have been at least $1.25 trillion instead of $797 billion. But, the President and congressional Democrats had to wage an incredible struggle to get enough votes to pass ARRA in the Senate. Even though there were 59 Democratic senators, only 56 of the 59 Democrats supported the bill and the support of one of the two independents wasn’t firm at all. This meant that President Obama had to win over at least three Republicans to break a filibuster. None of the three Republican senators, who were the most likely to be persuaded, were willing to vote for a $1.25 trillion stimulus bill. Under those circumstances, the President had to reach a compromise with these three in order to achieve what was possible. This affected the size and composition of the bill.
The President could have said, “No deal.” Congressional Democrats could have said, “My way or the highway.” Remember the economy was hemorrhaging 750,000 jobs a month when ARRA was enacted in February of 2009. To have turned our back on a bipartisan compromise would have meant turning our backs on hundreds of thousands of Americans who were losing their jobs every week.
By the way, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act weren’t small potatoes. It is the largest domestic spending bill in history. And it was pivotal to breaking the back of the Great Recession.
G-Man: Speaking of the Tea Party, your colleagues in the House and Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. Andre Carson and Rep. Maxine Waters, made comments that many considered to be unbecoming of an elected official. Carson stated, "The Tea Party wants Blacks hanging on a tree." Prior to that, Rep. Waters told a crowd, "As far as I'm concerned, the Tea Party can go straight to hell!" Again, the remarks were made by Black politicians -- and Tea Party members are predominately white. This being the case, are you concerned that the issue of race will be thrust into the 2012 Presidential election, possibly damaging President Obama's re-election bid?
Meeks: Race was an issue in the 2008 election. It is an issue in the disrespect shown toward this President. One way or another and to one extent or another, regardless of my colleagues’ comments, it is likely to be one of the subtexts of the 2012 election. How much of a subtext depends on a whole set of dynamics. What I think we should not lose sight of is the continuing potential for and possibility of the Obama reelection campaign again mobilizing a powerful multiracial electoral coalition. Let’s not forget that he won 43 percent of the white vote in 2008. That translated into more than 40 million votes. All of the President’s supporters should work for a repeat performance among white voters while trying to achieve an historic turnout of Black and Latino voters.
G-Man: Has the Tea Party helped or hurt the political system?
Meeks: First of all, the Tea Party is a faction of the Republican Party. So as a practical matter, we are talking about Tea Party Republicans. As far as I can tell, the entire strategy of this faction is to mobilize total opposition and non-cooperation with President Obama and to block bipartisan compromise between Republicans and Democrats in Congress. The important thing to understand is that in regard to policy the 60-member Tea Party Caucus in the House of Representatives, and apparently the 4-member Tea Party Caucus in the Senate, differs with other right wing and conservative congressional Republicans only in degree. They adhere to the no-compromise, cut taxes, cut government spending, “starve the beast” strategy the Republican Party has pursued with ever-increasing ferocity since Ronald Reagan’s presidency.
The Constitution created a system of checks and balances and a structure of government based on the separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government and between the federal government and the states. Unless a party controls the White House and both houses of Congress, including holding a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, compromise is the only way to get anything done — especially major things. Compromise compels both parties, both houses of Congress, as well as the president to take each other’s interests into account. Gridlock results when one party or even a sizeable faction of one party refuses to compromise or even acknowledge that the other party has valid concerns and that all involved have the interests of the country at heart. A “my way or the highway” approach produces dysfunction — not only in our political system. This explains, in part, the growing lack of confidence that the public, businesses, and other countries have in the U.S. government’s ability to make tough decisions and to get things done.
In my view, dysfunction is what a critical mass of Tea Party Republicans and other right wing Republicans have intentionally imposed on the 112th Congress. I could cite example after example: the near shutdown of the federal government last spring, the failure to enact jobs legislation, and the debt ceiling debt that brought our country to brink of default. Imagine what would have happened had President Obama and the Democratic leaders in Congress had not stood up to the Tea Party Republicans?
G-Man: Talk-show host Tavis Smiley and Dr. Cornell West recently toured the country in effort to raise awareness about the plight of Black America: the skyrocketing rate of unemployment, high levels of incarceration, and inequality on numerous levels. Moreover, the two men have taken President Obama to task for failing to address many of the economic and social conditions that are impacting Blacks more than anyone else. Do you believe they're right in their assessment of the President?
Meeks: No, I don’t. Nor, are they adding clarity to whom and what is responsible for the conditions many Blacks face. It seems to me that those who are blocking the President’s agenda ought to be the ones taken to task. To blame the President, to refuse to acknowledge what this president has achieved in the face of unprecedented opposition, to imply that an administration that succeeded in extending health care coverage to 32 million more Americans, saving the American auto industry from collapse, settling a 30 year discrimination suit brought by Black farmers, increasing funding for historically Black colleges, reforming the student loan program, repeatedly extending unemployment benefits, and in protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid while averting default, is a disservice precisely to the people on whose behalf Smiley, West, and others claim to speak.
G-Man: Former Ku Klux Klan leader and Louisiana Congressman David Duke stated that he may enter the 2012 race for the White House, if he can garner enough funding and support. I've interviewed leaders of the White Nationalist Movement, such as Tom Metzger, founder of the White Aryan Resistance (W.A.R.) and Pastor Thomas Robb of "The Knights Party, U.S.A.", which is an affiliate of the KKK. Metzger and Robb believe the dire state of the economy, illegal immigration, and anti-government sentiment, has created the perfect opportunity for a "white rights" candidate to emerge. With a growing number of angry and frustrated white voters losing jobs, homes, their families and hope, do you believe there is a real possibility that David Duke would be taken seriously if he decided to run in 2012.
Meeks: If you mean “by taken seriously” do I think he will receive widespread media attention and garner millions of votes, my answer is no. But that’s beside the point. A racist candidate or a candidate who plays the race card, or a candidate who looks the other way while his or her supporters, advisers, campaign activists, or media backers pollute the mainstream of American politics and political discourse with overt racism or racist innuendo is a clear and present danger to the unity of the American people and the integrity of the democratic process. Such a candidate should be denounced as such and rejected in total.
G-Man: If President Obama sought Congressional approval, would you support sending American troops into Libya?
Meeks: When it comes to deploying our military I don’t engage hypothetical questions. Besides, from the beginning of NATO involvement in Libya, President Obama has been and continues to be unequivocal: No American troops on the ground.
G-Man: One of the areas your represent is Far Rockaway, New York, which is the Eastern sector of the Rockaway peninsula. Your former colleague, Anthony Weiner, represented the Western sector of the Rockaways. What was your relationship like, in and outside of the halls of Congress, and how has it changed since his resignation?
Meeks: Rep. Weiner was an important member of the House Democratic Caucus and the New York congressional delegation. He fought hard for what he believed. He worked tirelessly on behalf of his constituents. He is missed.
I had a very good relationship with former Representative Weiner. I valued him as a colleague and a friend. I pray that he is getting all the help that he needs and that he will be successful in healing his family.
G-Man: What has been your biggest regret as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives?
Meeks: When I was elected to represent the Sixth Congressional District of New York in the House of Representatives of the United States Congress 13 years ago, I promised my constituents that I would not go to Washington, D.C. just to sit behind a desk. I vowed to make a difference in their lives and in our country. I have tried to do that. While I have been a team player within the Democratic Caucus and in relations with Democratic administrations I have not been afraid to take positions or to cast votes that many and sometimes most Democrats disagreed with or to reach across the aisle for bipartisan compromise.
I am proud of having worked my way up the ladder of leadership. I chaired the International Monetary Policy and Trade Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee in the last Congress, and I am the Ranking Member on the Europe and Eurasia Subcommittee of the House Foreign Affairs Committee in the current Congress.
I am especially proud of having a strong relationship with President Obama. I campaigned around the country for him in the 2008 general election. I’ve worked and will continue to work closely with the Administration on health care reform, financial regulatory reform, trade, the National Export Initiative, raising the debt ceiling, foreign affairs, and many other issues.
I don’t think it is bragging to say I have been in the thick of key legislative battles − especially enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act, which is the most far-reaching financial regulatory reform legislation in 80 years. In fact, I was a member of the conference committee that produced that legislation. I have introduced and passed legislation regarding minorities in the financial services industry. Just recently, I introduced the Putting America Back to Work Act of 2011. I am an active member of the Congressional Black Caucus and chair its political action committee. I am also a member of a number of other congressional caucuses, as well.
Above all, I have fought hard and effectively for my constituents on issues ranging from Social Security and Medicare to maintaining the veterans hospital located in the Sixth Congressional District to minority and local participation in the expansion of JFK Airport to improving the public schools to immigration to bringing federal aid to York College and St. Johns’ University to trying to work with lenders to assist homeowners facing foreclosure to mobilizing constituents to stop the excessive use of force by the police. I’ve sponsored job fairs that were attended by thousands. I hold town hall meetings. At the most recent one I was able to explain why I voted in favor of the deficit reduction legislation that kept our country from defaulting on its debt.
Although I have tried to be inclusive and responsive in regard to constituent services and public policy issues, I regret that I have not been able to accomplish more. Many of my constituents have not recovered from this Great Recession. I resolve to work even harder and more effectively. One of the ways I intend to do this is by working tirelessly for the reelection of President Barack Obama and for the Democrats to regain the majority in the House of Representatives and towards keeping the Senate majority. I fervently believe all three objectives are key to building upon what the Administration has accomplished and what Democrats in Congress have stood for in ways that will enable America to move forward again.
Multisource political news, world news, and entertainment news analysis by Newsy.com
By Adam FalkMultisource political news, world news, and entertainment news analysis by Newsy.com