By Sam Biddle
Something strange happens on election night. With polls closing,
American supporters of both parties briefly, intensely align as one: We
all want to know who’s going to win, and we don’t want to wait one more
minute. The ravenous national appetite for an immediate victor, pumped
up by frenzied cable news coverage and now Twitter, means delivering
hyper-updated results and projections before any official tally is
available. But the technologies that help ferry lightning-quick results
out of polling places and onto CNN are also some of the riskiest,
experts say.
It’s been almost two years since Russian military hackers attempted to
hijack computers used by both local election officials and VR Systems,
an e-voting company that helps make Election Day possible in several key
swing states. Since then, reports detailing the potent duo of inherent technical risk and abject negligence have
made election security a national topic. In November, millions of
Americans will vote again — but despite hundreds of millions of dollars
in federal aid poured into beefing up the security of your local polling
station, tension between experts, corporations, and the status quo over
what secure even means is leaving key questions unanswered: Should
every single vote be recorded on paper, so there’s a physical trail to
follow? Should every election be audited after the fact, as both a
deterrent and check against fraud? And, in an age where basically
everything else is online, should election equipment be allowed anywhere
near the internet?
Click here for the full article.
Source: The Intercept_
No comments:
Post a Comment