By Steven Jonas
Trump's racism, misogyny, Islamophobia, xenophobia and homophobia:
anything new, for a Republican? No, not in terms of policy. But the
attempts have always been made to cover these things up, to introduce
"deniability." The strategy/tactic goes back 50 years, under the hood
of the "Rightward Imperative." Trump has just undressed Repub. doctrine
in public, taken the hood off as it were, bringing it all out into the
open.
In the wake of Charlottesville and the Trumpite
response to it, the question can be asked, how far back does racism go in the Republican
Party? In 1962, a young Republican lawyer
named William Rehnquist was personally found, by a U.S. Assistant Attorney and an FBI agent , to be attempting to interfere with the voting rights of minority persons
in Phoenix, AZ. He was not charged. Rehnquist, who became a prominent supporter
of Barry Goldwater of Arizona in the 1964 Presidential election, denied that
the incident ever took place, although there is written evidence that it did.
In neither of his subsequent confirmation hearings
before the Senate Judiciary Committee, on his nomination to the Supreme Court
by Richard Nixon in 1971, nor his nomination for Chief Justice by Ronald Reagan
in 1986, was he questioned about the incident. If he had been, and he had denied that it
happened, a future Chief Justice of the Supreme Court apparently would have been
committing perjury. But his support for Goldwater,
the Republican Presidential nominee in 1964, was entirely consistent with his racist
activities in 1962. For one thing,
Goldwater had famously voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Beginning shortly after he was first elected President
in 1968, as is well-known, Richard Nixon began implanting what he openly termed
the "Southern Strategy" into the marrow of the Republican Party. It entailed moving the Party in the direction
of making racism central to their policy-making (while all the while denying
that that is what they were doing), so that, following the Democrats' enactment
of strong civil rights legislation and subsequent policies, the Repubs. could
take over the South politically. Then, in
his confessional after he was released from prison, John Erlichman, Nixon's top
domestic policy advisor, admitted that the so-called "Drug War" really had
nothing to do with drugs but rather with being able to actively discriminate against
and imprison significant numbers of African-Americans without appearing to do
so: a furtherance of racist policy, but still at least in part sub rosa.
Click here for the full article.
Source: OpEdNews.com
No comments:
Post a Comment