By Steven Jonas
"Shortly after noon on August 31 , [1939, Chancellor Adolf] Hitler [of Germany secretly] ordered hostilities against Poland to begin at 4:45 a.m. the next morning. At 8 p.m. on August 31, Nazi S.S. troops wearing Polish uniforms staged a phony invasion of Germany, damaging several minor installations on the German side of the border. They also left behind a handful of dead concentration camp prisoners in Polish uniforms to serve as further evidence of the supposed Polish invasion, which Nazi propagandists publicized as an unforgivable act of aggression."
"Shortly after noon on August 31 , [1939, Chancellor Adolf] Hitler [of Germany secretly] ordered hostilities against Poland to begin at 4:45 a.m. the next morning. At 8 p.m. on August 31, Nazi S.S. troops wearing Polish uniforms staged a phony invasion of Germany, damaging several minor installations on the German side of the border. They also left behind a handful of dead concentration camp prisoners in Polish uniforms to serve as further evidence of the supposed Polish invasion, which Nazi propagandists publicized as an unforgivable act of aggression."
Of course, the planning for this
operation had been going on for quite some time, as had been the flood of Nazi
propaganda about how the "poor German residents" of Poland were being "horribly
mistreated" by the Polish Government.
(The Nazis has used the same excuse
for the invasion of Western Czechoslovakia in September, 1938,
summarized for all time by the single word "Munich .") But even with that run-up, the Nazis still set
up a "false flag" operation, even though hardly anyone in the world at the time
(with the possible exception of the pro-Nazi political forces in the United
States and Great Britain) would believe it.
(It happens that false flag
operations had been going on for quite some time. For example, at the time of the Mexican-American War of 1846-48 a first-term U.S. Congressman from Illinois thought it very
possible that President Polk had mis-located an attack by Mexican troops on those
of the U.S. along the disputed border, and that that attack had occurred on
Mexican, not U.S./Texas territory. He introduced
what were called the "Spot Resolutions," designed to determine just where the
original attack had occurred. His Congressional
initiative went nowhere and at the next election he lost his seat in the House
because of that initiative. His political
career was put on hold for some years because of that event, but he did
eventually achieve higher office in the U.S.
His name was Abraham Lincoln.)
And so why am I telling these stories
of false-flag and possible false-flag operations. Well, numbers of good friends and long-time
colleagues of mine took the position during the last Presidential campaign that
Donald Trump, at least as compared with Hillary Clinton, was the "peace"
candidate. After all, he spoke admiringly
of President Vladimir Putin (the first name "Vladimir" being the only discernable
characteristic that Putin has in common with the founder of the Soviet Union,
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin). He changed a component
of Republican National Platform from one that sharply criticized Russia over
the "Ukraine" events to one that softened it sharply. He openly asked the government of President Putin to hack Hillary Clinton's email files. More
importantly, he did talk about "de'tente" with Russia (even though that word was
always used to describe the easing of relations between the U.S. and the
U.S.S.R. [or China], not another capitalist power). And so on and so forth.
And so, the proto/21st/century
fascist tendencies that Trump revealed right from the beginning of his Presidential campaign were set aside as concerns by certain parties in the
U.S., in search of "peace." For one thing,
Clinton, who at one time had talked about establishing a "no-fly zone" over parts
of Syria, was considered a strong war hawk.
(If she had won and had she implemented that policy that could have led
to a shooting war between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. --- ooops, I mean Russia. It does happen that there are some folks,
including some seemingly experienced ones, who seem to get the two
confused. History lesson, folks: the
U.S.S.R. was, in terms of the ownership of the means of production at least, a
socialist nation, while the Russia is organized around a rapacious, robber-baron style of capitalism, based on a large set of means of production which
were stolen from the people of the U.S.S.R. at time of its collapse, aided and
abetted by U.S. stooge, the former Communist --- and drunk --- Boris Yeltsin.)
Click here for the full article.
Source: OpEdNews.com
No comments:
Post a Comment