WASHINGTON, DC – Jason
Furman, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, issued the
following statement today on the advance estimate of GDP for the
second quarter of 2015.
Posted by Jason Furman on July 30, 2015 at 09:30 AM EDT
Real GDP rose
faster in the second quarter than in the first, even after a large
upward revision to first-quarter growth. Strong personal consumption led
the rebound as consumers spent more of the windfall gains from lower
oil prices that they had saved in the first quarter, and many of the
temporary factors that restrained growth in the first quarter faded. The
President is committed to pushing Congress to increase investments in infrastructure as part of a long-term transportation reauthorization, to open our exports to new markets with new high-standards free trade agreements, and to ensure that fiscal brinksmanship or the sequester does not return in the next fiscal year as outlined in the President’s FY2016 Budget.
1. Real gross
domestic product (GDP) rose 2.3 percent at an annual rate in the second
quarter according to the BEA’s advance estimate, while first-quarter GDP
growth was revised up from a 0.2 percent decline to a 0.6 percent
increase. The revision to first-quarter GDP growth is
mostly accounted for by higher fixed investment growth than previously
estimated, in both the business and residential sectors. In the second
quarter, the rise in GDP growth was led by a faster pace of personal
consumption growth than the first quarter and a shift from negative to
positive net export growth. The drag from declining structures
investment was also much less negative for overall growth in the second
quarter than in the first. Incorporating the effects of the annual GDP
revision released today (see point 2), real GDP has now risen 2.3
percent over the past four quarters.
(Click on graphs to increase their size.)
2. The
Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) announced revisions to historical GDP
figures based on a number of technical factors including new and revised
source data, updated seasonal adjustment factors, and methodological
changes. The revisions occurred primarily in 2012,
2013, and 2014. On average, real GDP growth increased 2.0 percent per
year from 2011:Q4 to 2015:Q1—a downward revision of 0.2 percentage
point. Most of that revision is accounted for by slower personal
consumption growth than previously estimated. The consumption revision
largely reflects a new methodology for calculating the price of
financial services spending and revisions to source data on services.
Government spending growth was also revised downward, mostly reflecting
lower-than-estimated State and local spending, but also
lower-than-estimated Federal defense spending. Faster-than-estimated
private investment growth, mostly concentrated in the first quarter of
2015, partially offset these shifts. Most of the downward revision was
concentrated in the first two years subject to revision—2012 and
2013—while real GDP growth over the four quarters of 2014 was revised
up, from 2.4 percent to 2.5 percent.
3. Today’s
release marks the BEA’s first publication of the “average of GDP and
GDI,” which CEA terms “Gross Domestic Output (GDO).” Output is traditionally measured either by tracking all expenditures on final goods and services produced domestically (GDP) or by tracking all the income received
by producers of that output (Gross Domestic Income, or “GDI”). GDP and
GDI are conceptually identical, but they differ due to measurement
error. GDO is the arithmetic average of GDP and GDI. It can be a more
accurate measure of economic activity because averaging across the two
metrics reduces that measurement error. The first estimate of GDO growth
for the second quarter of 2015 will be released next month.
4. GDO is a more accurate measure of output in real-time than either GDP or GDI alone. The BEA
publishes an estimate of GDP growth nearly one month after each
quarter’s end, and revises it in each of the next two months. Three
months after each quarter’s end, we have estimates of output growth from
both the product side (GDP) and income side (GDI)—but those estimates
are based on preliminary and incomplete data and are still subject to
further revision years later. CEA finds that the “after three months”
reading of GDO is a better predictor of the “years later” revisions to
GDP than either GDP or GDI alone. This result illustrates the value of
combining GDP and GDI to improve our understanding of economic activity
in a given quarter. Another way to see the benefits of GDO is how it
reduces the “error variance”—the average squared difference between the
“after three months” GDP growth and “years later” GDP growth in our
sample. The simple average of GDP and GDI is quite close to the weighted
average that minimizes the error variance—that is, the average that
gets us closest to the “years later” GDP growth.
5. Real private
domestic final purchases (PDFP)—the sum of consumption and fixed
investment—rose 2.5 percent at an annual rate in the second quarter,
slightly faster than overall GDP but below the pace observed over the
past year. Real PDFP—which excludes noisy components like net exports, inventories, and government spending—is generally a more reliable measure of future GDP growth than current GDP.
While GDO aims to more accurately measure output growth in a given
quarter by minimizing measurement error, PDFP aims to measure signals of
future economic growth by eliminating some of the noise in GDP. Over
the past four quarters, PDFP grew 3.2 percent, a faster rate than
overall GDP. Beginning with today’s release, BEA will begin publishing
PDFP (under the name “final sales to private domestic purchasers”) as
part of the normal monthly GDP release.
As the
Administration stresses every quarter, GDP figures can be volatile and
are subject to substantial revision. Therefore, it is important not to
read too much into any one single report, and it is informative to
consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming
available.
Source: The White House Press Office
No comments:
Post a Comment